Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion 3
by Rushil Raval – Wednesday, March 30, 2022, 11:49 PM
Number of replies: 1
People are usually excited about new technologies because they enhance our lives. Usually, inventions make our tasks simple, stimulate us, sometimes amaze us with ingenuity and originality, even helping to achieve individual talents, economic rewards and save lives. In addition, innovations are significant for us to inspire innovators to continue producing new goods, ideas, services, etc. Most of the pictures are not designed for the creator himself.
Instead, the notion behind the necessity for another individual or entity to invest additional creativity into developing the product is disseminated. Inventions might originate from all across the globe. The innovations attempt to aid individuals and society to provide comfort to future generations.
When we work in an organization, we know that we mostly have to carry out a repetitive, monotonous job, making us less inventive and consuming a lot of time. To solve this issue, we offer machine learning to assist robots in behaving like people and taking care of a few duties that don’t need human participation.
I’d want to create automatic concept-drift identification software which can examine anything comparable in a code or even a machine and assist the device in learning it. This integrates several machines and facilitates all procedures and activities.
This may be highly beneficial to firms that deal with software items, increasing their productivity. The patent license may give the concept new life, and once licensees are secured, One will realize the product concept. Will take all the benefits that the product provides an enterprise and how other organizations approach this offering. This product might be a lot for firms interested in machine learning coding.
When a product is made accessible for licensing, it is easier for developers to still be accessible within the market. Cost of manufacturing may be saved whenever the product is made accessible for licensing. This allows us to gain a competitive edge and access global markets effortlessly. It is simpler to obtain prospective licensees by chasing the benefits and possibilities provided by this product.
References
Jolly, M., Fletcher, A. C., & Bourne, P. E. (2012). Ten Simple Rules to Protect Your Intellectual Property. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(11), e1002766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002766
Ledwith, A., & o’dwyer, M. (2008). Product launch, product advantage, and market orientation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(1), 96-110. doi:10.1108/14626000810850865
Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion |
Discussion