Creating Your Dream Job Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Creating Your Dream Job Assignment
Assignment 5: Creating Your Dream Job
Due Week 10 and worth 300 points
In this assignment, you get the chance to create your dream job and to build its compensation plan and appraisal performance.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
Create a job description and specifications for your dream job.
Design a compensation and benefits package related to your dream job.
Rationalize your compensation and benefits package. Be sure to indicate the research and considerations that went into the design of the compensation and benefits package.
Imagine this is the only position of its kind in the organization. From this perspective, design a performance appraisal program to assess your job performance.
Rationalize your performance appraisal program. Be sure to indicate the research and considerations that went into the design of the performance appraisal program.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Discuss job analysis, job descriptions, and specifications.
Analyze various techniques, considerations, and designs of employee compensation programs.
Analyze various techniques, considerations, and designs of performance appraisal programs.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in human resource management.
Write clearly and concisely about human resource management using proper writing mechanics.
If You can follow the guidelines of the assignment as given above and the rubric instructions in the exemplary column then i can use you. if not don’t bother asking for the assignment.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Creating Your Dream Job Assignment
Points: 300 Assignment 5: Creating Your Dream Job Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D
Fair 70-79% C
Proficient 80-89% B
Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Create a job description and specifications for your dream job. Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely created a job description and specifications for your dream job. Insufficiently created a job description and specifications for your dream job. Partially created a job description and specifications for your dream job. Satisfactorily created a job description and specifications for your dream job. Thoroughly created a job description and specifications for your dream job. 2. Design a compensation and benefits package related to your dream job. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely designed a compensation and benefits package related to your dream job. Insufficiently designed a compensation and benefits package related to your dream job. Partially designed a compensation and benefits package related to your dream job. Satisfactorily designed a compensation and benefits package related to your dream job. Thoroughly designed a compensation and benefits package related to your dream job. 3. Rationalize your compensation and benefits package. Be sure to indicate the research and considerations that went into the design of the compensation and benefits package. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely rationalized your compensation and benefits package; did not submit or incompletely indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the compensation and benefits package. Insufficiently rationalized your compensation and benefits package; insufficiently indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the compensation and benefits package. Partially rationalized your compensation and benefits package; partially indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the compensation and benefits package. Satisfactorily rationalized your compensation and benefits package; satisfactorily indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the compensation and benefits package. Thoroughly rationalized your compensation and benefits package; thoroughly indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the compensation and benefits package. 4. Imagine this is the only position of its kind in the organization. From this perspective, design a performance appraisal program to assess your job performance. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely imagined this is the only position of its kind in the organization; did not submit or incompletely designed a performance appraisal program to assess your job performance. Insufficiently imagined this is the only position of its kind in the organization; insufficiently designed a performance appraisal program to assess your job performance. Partially imagined this is the only position of its kind in the organization; partially designed a performance appraisal program to assess your job performance. Satisfactorily imagined this is the only position of its kind in the organization; satisfactorily designed a performance appraisal program to assess your job performance. Thoroughly imagined this is the only position of its kind in the organization; thoroughly designed a performance appraisal program to assess your job performance. 5. Rationalize your performance appraisal program. Be sure to indicate the research and considerations that went into the design of the performance appraisal program. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely rationalized your performance appraisal program; did not submit or incompletely indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the performance appraisal program. Insufficiently rationalized your performance appraisal program; insufficiently indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the performance appraisal program. Partially rationalized your performance appraisal program; partially indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the performance appraisal program. Satisfactorily rationalized your performance appraisal program; satisfactorily indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the performance appraisal program. Thoroughly rationalized your performance appraisal program; thoroughly indicated the research and considerations that went into the design of the performance appraisal program. 6. 3 references Weight: 5%
No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; some references high quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. 7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%
More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Creating Your Dream Job Assignment