Criminal Law Module 7 Written Assignment 4
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Criminal Law Module 7 Written Assignment 4
Subject: Criminal Law
Topic: Module 7- Written Assignment 4
Paper details:
Criminal Law Module 7 Written Assignment 4
Directions for Each written Assignment: Each summary or comparison assignments shall consist of a short synopsis, approximately 5 pages. Each summary has directions outlined in CANVAS.
Relevant items may include examples from newspaper or magazine articles, websites, books, events, etc can be used for example purposes. The goal of the summaries is to allow students to
explore relevant topics of interest, and relate course learning to what is going on in the world. These are not research papers, just brief summaries. Requirements for the summaries are: Each
summary must be submitted according to the Written Assignment Requirements. The source of each summary must be cited (APA)
Criminal Law Module 7 Written Assignment 4
All to be submitted in APA format. Each summary must relate the content of the item to the course; this means you explain the relevance of the item to our class material. Each summary
assignment is submitted on time and the student fully develops the questions posed to them in each of the summary The Innocence Project has been working to exonerate innocent inmates. Chose
a case from the innocence project. Research the original case and conviction. Summarize the original case and conviction as well as the exoneration. Conclude with what the Innocence Project is
currently working on with regards policy reform to address concerns in the system. https://innocenceproject.org/all-cases/
Criminal Law Module 7 Written Assignment 4
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results