Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
Originality of case and quality of sources.
(20%)
Research case not original.
Few/no primary sources. Few/no secondary sources. No refereed papers.
Research case not original. Minimal primary sources. Minimal secondary sources. Two refereed papers.
Original research case. More than adequate primary sources. More than adequate secondary sources. More than two refereed papers.
Original research case. Impressive primary sources. Impressive secondary sources. Impressive refereed papers.
Original research case. Outstanding primary sources. Outstanding secondary sources. Impressive refereed papers.
Level of analysis and use of BSP concepts.
(25%)
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
Analysis absent. Little use of BSP concepts.
Minimal analysis (i.e. perspectives identified and described, but only superficially related). General use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
More than adequate analysis (i.e. perspectives identified, described and differences and similarities discussed). In- depth use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
Impressive analysis (i.e. relations between different perspectives integrated and implications noted). Impressive nuanced use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
Outstanding analysis (i.e. nuanced identification of different perspectives and contradictions within sectors; relations between perspectives integrated and implications, patterns and contradictions discussed). Original and outstanding nuanced use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
Substantiation of arguments and quality of discussion.
(15%)
No discussion or argument.
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
Minimal explanations to substantiate points. Adequate discussion.
Convincing arguments to substantiate points. Thoughtful discussion.
Relevant and convincing arguments to substantiate points. Thoughtful and in-depth discussion.
Relevant, convincing and nuanced arguments to substantiate points; different perspectives integrated. Outstandingly thoughtful and in-depth discussion.
Critical thinking and reflection.
(15%)
Not demonstrated.
Minimal critical thinking and reflection evident.
Effective critical thinking and reflection evident.
Superior critical thinking and reflection evident.
Outstanding critical thinking and reflection evident.
Quality of conclusion.
(10%)
Simplistic; superficial. Irrelevant ideas presented.
Rather simplistic but relevant.
Succinct and thoughtful.
Insightful and thoughtful with broader implications noted.
Insightful, thoughtful and original with broader implications noted.
Organisation of report.
(5%)
Poorly organised.
Relatively well organised.
Well organised. Effectively organised.
Attractively organised.
Correctness of referencing.
(5%)
Poorly referenced.
Referencing sometimes correct.
Referencing mostly correct.
Almost completely correct referencing.
Completely correct referencing.
Clarity of expression.
(5%)
Unsatisfactory; not clear.
Satisfactory but with difficulties.
Some language mistakes; basically well written.
Very well written with few minor mistakes.
Excellent writing.
Home>Information Systems homework help>FOUR
Number of Pages: 4 (Double Spaced)
Writing Style: APA
Number of sources: 3
Imagine you are the leader of the IT team at the national headquarters for a company supplying western wear to an international market. The owner, Sam Yosemite, tells your IT team to provide support to four (4) new
satellite offices but his instructions are vague and incoherent. You only know that the employees in the new offices (numbering about 20 staff for each) will have to be self-sufficient and mirror nearly all the applications
used at headquarters, but on minimal budgets. The satellite offices will be in operation for a combined total of 24 hours each day. Each office will operate based on its own set of local business hours, which do not overlap
among other satellite offices. Your IT staff is solely responsible for providing support to the satellite offices. Your boss needs to keep the costs for licensing and support low or risk cutting into the budget for the IT staff
salaries. Write a three to four (3-4) page proposal paper which covers the following: 1. Differentiate between best uses of Active Directory (AD) versus New Technology File System (NTFS) permissions. 2. Analyze how you
would utilize NTFS permissions for security and appropriate access. 3. Compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of different application server options. Be specific in your configuration specifications. 4.
Choose an application server option that best suits the needs described by the scenario and explain why the application server option you chose is best. 5. Determine the best way configure and deploy file server(s). 6.
Determine how to configure and deploy printers. 7. Use Visio or a similar tool to depict graphically the physical and logical layout of your plan. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page
length. 8. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow