Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Critical thinking and its relevance or effectiveness
Getting started
Through the process of critical thinking, a researcher can determine the relevance or effectiveness of a particular article or resource on a chosen topic. It is common to encounter various viewpoints as you consider your topic or research
interests and depending on the level of controversy of the topic, the value of evaluating the logic of the article can be significant. Consider a simple example such as the minimum wage. If you were to search for articles on this topic, you would
quickly find there are varying viewpoints and opinions. Being able to evaluate the logic of the authors stance will be important to determine the usefulness of this source to support or counterbalance your opinion.
This activity provides an opportunity to analyze an article you have chosen for your research. By applying this template, you will be able to determine if this source is valuable and relevant to your work.
Upon successful completion of this assignment, you will be able to:
Apply a critical thinking model to analyze an article.
APA 7th edition,
2 pages
Background Information
The Discerning Reader and Writer
As you read the article you will source for this written assignment, keep in mind the quality writing tips you have learned in your reading. One significant way to begin improving your writing skills is to improve your reading skills. By reading, at
once and on different levels, you will not only be taking in and processing the words (and information) that are displayedbut you will also be consciously assessing the quality of the information, the craft of the writing, and the aesthetics of the
formatting. In other words, you will begin to read differently as a resultyou will become a discerning reader. By reading actively, you will inherently build habits of observation that can carry over into your doctoral and professional writing through the use of new words and a multitude of ways to articulate what you want to say.
As you analyze the logic of the article selected for this assignment, be on the lookout for the phrases that should be avoided at the start of a sentence. If you reviewed your most recent coursework submissions or contributions to the ADP, would any of the sentence start taboos be found?
1. According to . . .
2. There is a . . .
3. It is [important, critical, advised, suggested, and so on] . . .
4. In my opinion . . .
5. The purpose of this [email, post, article] is . . .
6. In 2014 [or any year] . . .
7. I think [believe] that . . . (Handley, 2014, p. 26)
Instructions
1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
2. Read the of The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools.
3. Locate and download a scholarly article through OCLS(new tab) on the topic you are considering for your own blog and article assignments in this course. If the topic is suitable for your ADP research focus or a business-related topic that is of interest to you, it will be more useful in the long term.
4. Complete the Analyzing the Logic of an Article Template(Word document) in its entirety, answering each question fully. Your responses should provide evidence of critical thinking.
1. Place the complete APA reference at the top of the first page.
2. Include your full name in the header or footer of the template. No cover page is needed if your name is in the header or footer.
3. Provide a detailed response indicating your response for each line item as part of the process of article. deconstruction. Include the direct quote or place in the article where the logic was found, as appropriate., as appropriate.
5. Submit the completed template and a copy of the scholarly article by the end of the workshop.
Review the associated rubric
Critical thinking and its relevance or effectiveness
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Critical thinking and its relevance or effectiveness