Cuban American Video Artist Discussion
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Cuban American Video Artist Discussion
Question Description
Please write a reflection paper (5 pages, double spaced) on the artist Ana Mendieta
Please note: You can find valuable information about the definition of a reflection paper in the internet. Checking it may make it easier for you to enter the writing process.
Concerning the process of writing:
It is important that you think about the reader of your essay: Why should anybody be interested to read it?
If you make a research question enticing and establish the relevance of it, you have a good change to draw interest from (possible) readers.
Each question leads to the next question. This is a guiding principle.
If you write a text, and you are not totally clear about how to approach the topic, you may reflect on what are the most important things to think about and write about. In you reflection you may come up with three things that you find most important to write about, and these might become the columns that uphold the whole building of your text.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Cuban American Video Artist Discussion
Cuban American Video Artist Discussion