Data, Critical Analysis and Uncertainties Discussion Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Data, Critical Analysis and Uncertainties Discussion Essay
- Professional Presentation/ 1
- Well organized, neatly presented, word processed, spelling, grammar, and punctuation
- Name and student number as well as lab partner/s name, date and time of experiment
- In-text referencing, reference list at end of report
- Title and Abstract/ 1
- Title: concise title directly above abstract (even if you have it on the cover page already)
- Abstract: Brief description of the experiment, the major results, associated uncertainties, comparison with theoretical results/expected results.
- Introduction and Aims/ 1
- A brief paragraph describing key physics and relevant background
- At the end of the introduction, state the aims of experiment
- Procedure and Apparatus/ 0.5
- Describe the equipment used, you may include labeled sketches, drawing, or photographs of apparatus
- Describe how you conducted the experiment. Remember to use past tense, you are telling the reader what you have done.
- Risk Assessment/ 0.5
- Use a risk assessment matrix (under lab section of Blackboard) to:
(i) Consider the health and safety risk of this experiment to yourself and others in the laboratory.
(ii) Determine what measures you would put in place to mitigate/reduce these risks where possible.
- Attach the risk assessment at the end of your report after the references list
- Data, Critical Analysis and Uncertainties / 2
- Data presented in numbered table format with proper titles and headings ie. “Table 1: Description of Some Tabulated Data”
- Figures to presented with number headings and with proper titles and headings ie. “Figure 1: Graph of some Data”
- You should write text which refers to/describes data in tables and plots
- Show calculations of key parameters and calculations of uncertainties where necessary
- Present data in scientific notation where applicable
- Use appropriate SI units – eg. metres (m), seconds (s), metres per second (m/s).
- Summary and Discussions /2
- Brief summary the experiment and aims
- Describe the results and put them in context with the expected or theoretical values – do they match? If not, why? You may need to do some research for this part.
- Identify the major source(s) of uncertainty and how they contribute to the final uncertainty
- Statements describing ways to improve the precision and/or accuracy of the final result by improving the method employed as well as considering alternative equipment
- Unnecessary repetition of method or results will not be considered as discussion
- Answers to specific questions /2
Data, Critical Analysis and Uncertainties Discussion Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow