Data Mart vs. Data Warehouse
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Data Mart vs. Data Warehouse
A data mart and a data warehouse are two different types of data storage and management systems used in modern data analytics. While they share some similarities, there are several significant differences between them.
A data warehouse is a large, centralized repository of data that is used for decision-making purposes. Data warehouses are typically designed to store a wide variety of data from different sources, including transactional databases, flat files, and other data sources. The data is organized and structured in a way that makes it easy to analyze and query using business intelligence (BI) tools.
In contrast, a data mart is a smaller, more focused subset of a data warehouse. A data mart is typically designed to serve a specific business function or department, such as sales or marketing. The data within a data mart is usually pre-processed and structured to meet the needs of the specific business function it serves.
One key difference between a data warehouse and a data mart is their scope. A data warehouse is typically designed to serve the needs of an entire organization, whereas a data mart is focused on a specific business function or department. As a result, data warehouses tend to be much larger and more complex than data marts.
Another key difference between data warehouses and data marts is their data integration approach. Data warehouses are designed to integrate data from multiple sources, using complex ETL (extract, transform, load) processes to transform and standardize data. This makes data warehouses ideal for organizations that need to integrate data from multiple sources and perform complex analytics. In contrast, data marts are designed to be more self-contained and typically integrate data from a single source, making them easier to manage and maintain.
In terms of scalability, data warehouses are typically more scalable than data marts. This is because data warehouses are designed to handle large volumes of data from multiple sources, whereas data marts are typically focused on a smaller subset of data.
Overall, both data warehouses and data marts have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs of the organization. While data warehouses are more complex and require more resources to set up and maintain, they offer greater flexibility and scalability. On the other hand, data marts are simpler and more focused, making them easier to manage and maintain, but also limiting their scope and scalability.
Data Mart vs. Data Warehouse
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow