Data Lake vs. Data Warehouse
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Data Lake vs. Data Warehouse
A data lake and a data warehouse are both technologies used for managing large volumes of data, but they differ in several key ways.
A data warehouse is a system that is designed for storing, organizing, and analyzing structured data from various sources. Data warehouses are typically used for business intelligence and reporting purposes, and are optimized for querying and analysis. Data is typically cleaned, transformed, and loaded into the data warehouse in a structured format, which makes it easier to query and analyze. Data warehouses are typically based on a relational database model, and often use SQL as the primary querying language.
On the other hand, a data lake is a system that is designed for storing large volumes of unstructured and semi-structured data from various sources. Data lakes are typically used for data exploration and data science purposes, and are optimized for storing and processing large volumes of raw data. Data is typically ingested into the data lake in its original format, and may be stored in a variety of forms, including files, objects, or streams. Data lakes often use Hadoop or cloud-based storage technologies, and may use a variety of processing frameworks, such as Spark or Flink.
One of the key advantages of a data lake is its flexibility. Because data is stored in its original format, data scientists and analysts have the ability to explore and analyze data in a variety of ways, without being limited by the structure of a data warehouse. Data lakes also provide a cost-effective way to store large volumes of data, as they can often be built using commodity hardware and open-source software.
However, data lakes also have some disadvantages. Because data is stored in its original format, it can be more difficult to manage and ensure data quality. Data lakes also lack the built-in governance and security features of a data warehouse, which can make it harder to ensure compliance with regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA.
In summary, data warehouses and data lakes are both valuable technologies for managing large volumes of data, but they are designed for different purposes. Data warehouses are optimized for structured data and business intelligence, while data lakes are optimized for unstructured and semi-structured data and data science. The choice between a data warehouse and a data lake will depend on the specific needs of your organization, and may involve a combination of both technologies.
Data Lake vs. Data Warehouse
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow