Data Mining and Analytical Processing Project
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Data Mining and Analytical Processing Project
Question: In approximately one and a half to two pages total, write your analysis of the three approaches from a consumer’s point of view. Finally, select what you believe to be the best approach and explain why you chose this approach.
SEE LINK: https://baymard.com/blog/live-chat-usability-issues
Your word document should have the following;
- Title page, with your name, class, date, and assignment identifier
- Body of the paper (one or two pages) double spaced, 12 point font, New Times Roman, 1-inch margins on all sides
- References should be identified/listed on a separate page (last page of submission). All references must follow APA format.
- Save in Word format
—————————————————————————————————————–
Data Mining and Analytical Processing
In two to three paragraphs briefly describe what online businesses can learn from data mining (or analytical processing) activities.
SEE LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-sGvh6tI04
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Data Mining