decision for moving an organization forward
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
decision for moving an organization forward
Previous paper attached for guidance so this paper will build upon it.
Your executive team, the “C-Suite” (CEO, CIO, CFO, CMO, and CNO), was impressed with your report detailing the legal, financial, and non-financial impact the data breach had on your organization. They were also impressed with your research on federally sponsored initiatives designed to ensure that the institution is providing high-quality healthcare, patient and staff safety, and data protection.
However, in order for the executive team to make the best decision for moving the organization forward, they need additional information. This time they want to know what ethical and/or legal risks may have contributed to the data breach, as well as policy recommendations for how the organization can ensure that such a breach does not happen again without compromising quality healthcare and patient and staff safety.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Ethical and Legal Considerations:
- Analyze any ethical and legal risks that you feel may have contributed to the data breach. Be sure to cite specific examples from your research in supporting your claims.
- Determine how the information compromised during the data breach will be maintained. Be sure to cite specific examples from your research in supporting your claims.
- Policy Recommendations
- Considering the nature of the data breach, provide technology-based recommendations for ensuring data confidentiality and preventing future breaches of this sort. Consider the potential patient rights issues when making your recommendations. Be sure to justify your recommendations with research.
- Provide recommendations for solving organizational challenges that may have contributed to this breach. What policy elements should be implemented to prevent this from happening in the future? Do staff need additional training surrounding data security? Why should the HIPAA Security Rule around administrative, technical, and physical safeguards be included in the policy? Be sure to support your recommendations with specific research.
- Provide recommendations based on the currently available federally sponsored initiatives that your organization should subscribe to in order to improve quality and safety within its structure, as well as reducing gaps in securing patient information. Be sure to support your recommendations with specific research.
Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be at least 3 pages in length (not including the cover page or reference page). At least two scholarly resources must be referenced. Use APA format for the reference list and all internal citations.
Be sure to use the following section headings:
- Ethical and Legal Considerations: Ethical and Legal Risks
- Ethical and Legal Considerations: Maintain
- Policy Recommendations: Technology-Based
- Policy Recommendations: Organizational Challenges
- Policy Recommendations: Reducing Gaps
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results