Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paper details:
Answer the following questions with about 2-3 sentences per question. Attached are reading materials for assistance along with the questions. 1. What is a decision-making procedure? If a moral theory doesn’t supply a decision-making procedure, what is it doing instead? 2. What kind of self-interest do ethical egoists promote? What kind don’t they promote? 3. What is psychological egoism, and how does it relate to ethical egoism? 4. What is the principle of utility? 5. In what situations might quantitative utilitarianism be useful? In what situations not? 6. What is Mill’s argument for utilitarianism? 7. About a third of the way through the reading from Mill, he says, “From this verdict of the only competent judges, I apprehend there can be no appeal.” What is he talking about? Who are these “competent judges,” and what is their verdict? How is this an argument for qualitative utilitarianism? 8. Mill asserts that the golden rule of Christianity is “the complete spirit of the ethics of utility” Why? (Be sure to say what the golden rule is.)
decision-making procedure Reading Questions
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
decision-making procedure Reading Questions |
decision-making procedure Reading Questions