Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Disaster and Emergency Management Program
DEM5055: Emergency Management Planning and Evaluation
State assignment question here
This is the body of your work. Please be sure to identify and address all the requirements of the assignment question. Use proper APA for ALL in-text citations. If you read something and use it in your writing CITE IT. If you are unsure of APA, refer to the following online resource: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/. You are also highly encouraged to purchase the following to assist you: https://www.amazon.com/Publication-Manual-American-Psychological-Association/dp/1433805618/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1518386218&sr=8-1&keywords=APA+guide&dpID=41HoczBHr2L&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch
References
(References should be single-spaced, with a double-space between entries. Use hanging indent)
Here are some APA reference examples to help:
Drabek, T. (1987). The professional emergency manager: Structures and strategies for success. Boulder: University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science.
Drabek, T. (1991). The evolution of emergency management. In T. E. Drabek & G. J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 329). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
Eagelson, R. (2001). Model of professionalism. Wyoming Nurse, 14(2), 512.
Emergency Management Accreditation Program. (2015). EMAP accredited programs. Retrieved from http://www.emap.org/index.php/what-is-emap/who-is-accredited
Erramilli, B. P., & Waugh, W. (2014). Benchmarks and standards for emergency management in India and the United States. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Crisis and emergency management: Theory and practice (pp. 633644). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Evetts, J. (2011). Sociological analysis of professionalism: Past, present and future. Comparative Sociology, 10(1), 137.
Florida Emergency Preparedness Association, (2014a). The purpose of FEPA. Retrieved from http://fepa.org/about-us
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2007). Principles of emergency management. Retrieved from: http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1822-25045
-7625/principles_of_emergency_management.pdf
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2013). FEMA: About the agency. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/about-agency
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
DEM5055 Disaster and Emergency Management Program