Description of validity, and reliability estimates
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Description of validity, and reliability estimates
‘Research Proposal Draft
Write a 2–3-page paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal. Below find suggested headings you should use to organize your paper. The headings are in correct format (placement). These headings will help you address each item on the rubric.
Methodology
Controlling Extraneous Variables
Extraneous Variables (and plan for how controlled).
Instrument Appropriate for Research Question
Description of Instrument
Validity and reliability estimates.
Instruments: Description, validity, and reliability estimates, which have been performed (on a pre-established measure). Include plans for testing validity and reliability of generating your own instrument(s).
Description of Intervention
Description of the Intervention
Data Collection Procedures
Data Collection Procedures
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Identifies extraneous variables and plan for how controlled. 5 Instrument is appropriate to address research question. 5 Includes description of the selected instrument(s), validity, and reliability estimates. 5 Description of the Intervention is fully addressed. 5 Data Collection Procedures are clear and succinct. 5 Followed APA guidelines for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources. 5 Total: 30
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Description of validity, and reliability estimates