Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Developmental And Cognitive Disorders Mental Illness
Review the information on disorders in your final chapters as well as chapter 10, pages 283-307 in preparation
As you have read the material for the past few weeks, have you been reminded of anyone that you suspect might be diagnosed into one of the personality disorder categories such as:
Paranoid Personality Disorder
Schizoid/Schizotypal Personality Disorder
Antisocial, Borderline
Histrionic
Narcissistic
Anxious/Fearful
Dependent, or Obsessive-Compulsive?
What about other diagnoses from our final chapters on the Developmental and Cognitive disorders such as Autism, Mental Retardation, or Asperger’s?
share your thoughts. You may write about yourself, a family member, or even a famous person that you suspect or know has one of these diagnoses or tendencies. Think about how these disorders are portrayed in the media. If you think of a movie or show
that portrays the illness, list it. If you can find a website or online video link, cite that source as well and post the link.
Do you think the media portrays the experience accurately? Why or why not?
Is it portrayed respectfully; too seriously; with too much humor?
Do you think there is an unnecessary stigma attached to mental illness?
How might this affect a person in treatment?
Psy 101 Psychology Reflection Paper
Chapter 16 Reflection Paper
The textbook and lecture notes discussed Dr. Albert Ellis’s Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy. Make sure to review this material. Also, if you have not already done so, make sure to listen to the brief audio recording of Ellis describing his theory.
Here is the link: https://soundcloud.com/albertellis/theory-and-prac… (Links to an external site.)
Albert Ellis-Theory and Practice of RET
Source: Soundcloud
Now, after having reflected on this model, answer the following question:
Do you agree with Dr. Ellis that one’s thoughts have a direct bearing on their feelings and behaviors? Why or why not? Make sure that you provide enough detail to support your answer.
Below is a transcript of the above-noted audio.
Speaker 1 (00:00 (Links to an external site.)):
Suppose you go out in a crowded bus or some other area, and somebody pokes you meanly and viciously in the ribs with his elbow or an umbrella, and immediately in a split second, you’re angry. And maybe you’re so mad that you’re going to poke him back, and you’re umbrella, or your elbow is already swinging in his direction to poke him back because you’re so sore at his vicious behavior when suddenly you see that he’s blind.
What happens to your anger? I ask people this all the time and almost all the time, unsophisticated and sophisticated people notice right away that the anger vanishes; it does not become repressed as it would in Freudian theory, where you’d be angry, you wouldn’t want to admit that you are. You’d repress it, get rid of the anger. It doesn’t even become suppressed. Where quite consciously you’d say, oh, he’s blind
Speaker 1 (01:04 (Links to an external site.)):
I must not be angry at him. It goes away and is replaced in almost all instances by other emotions. Usually, the feeling that replaces anger is a pity. You start pitying this man for being blind, or maybe even guilt because you say here, I was about to strike this man, and he’s blind. Now pity and guilt are radically different emotions than anger. And what happens is the emotion of anger changes in a split second because you are about to poke him. Maybe your arm was swinging, and suddenly you stop it, and you have a different feeling. And the reason it changes I saw was because of what happens at B, and the stimulus A is still the same. He poked you in the ribs. Maybe you still have the pain in your ribs, but C, your anger at him is no longer the same, because at B, where you were telling yourself that dirty so and
Speaker 1 (02:02 (Links to an external site.)):
so, he poked me in the ribs; how could he do that to me? You are now saying something like that poor man is blind. Isn’t that a shame that he’s blind? He couldn’t help it, or else you’re saying something along the line of how could I possibly have got angry at him when he’s blind? And as I said before, you get guilty; well, this is what always happens to human beings. Something occurs at point A. They tell themselves something at point B; they experience an emotion at point C, then by a feedback mechanism, they notice the experience. They see their anger or their guilt, or their upset.
Then they tell themselves something about that. And then they get still another emotion very often, or an intensification of the first one. And it keeps going around and around, but it is not the external environment that influences you. It is what you tell yourself, your philosophy of life, about that environment.
Now, part of what you tell yourself will be because certain things happen to you. If certain things are negative all the time, there’s a normal tendency to say to yourself, well, this is terrible. This is awful. I can’t stand this rather than well; that’s too bad these negative influences occur. But the fact that there’s a normal tendency doesn’t mean that you have to do this.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Developmental And Cognitive Disorders Mental Illness |
Developmental And Cognitive Disorders Mental Illness