Differentiation and Personalization Case Study Research
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Differentiation and Personalization Case Study Research
8082 -Module 3 Assignment 2:
Differentiation and Personalization
Certainly, adults have different interests, strengths, and comfort zones. Listening to a fascinating 90-minute lecture, creating a new invention, giving an interactive 30-minute presentation, crafting a heartfelt essay, or making a video of a groundbreaking experiment are all examples of activities that involve learning. It is likely that one of these experiences sounds more interesting to you than the rest, or there may be one that you would immediately remove from this list. Children are no different. The same approach or activity will not always engage every child. The same skill or learning objective can be achieved in many ways.
Another consideration related to learning activities is examining the developmental and cognitive levels of individual learners. The same activity can be imagined at a variety of levels to match, or reasonably challenge, the ability of each learner.
For this module’s Assignment, you will develop a conference presentation on differentiating learning experiences for young children.
To Prepare:
Imagine that you have been asked to present on the topic of differentiating and personalizing learning experiences for young children at your state’s AEYC conference. You will develop:
- a proposal for your presentation
- an outline of your session, including at least two interactive elements that promote audience participation
- a narrated PowerPoint deck
- a handout for participants
Assignment Task
Create a 20-slide PowerPoint with notes and/or written narration for your presentation that provides evidence-based information addressing the following:
- How and personalization promotes healthy development and learning in early childhood settings.
- How project-based learning exemplifies personalization, and differentiation, with specific examples.
- How the workshop approach exemplifies personalization and differentiation, with specific examples
- At least two additional approaches or strategies for differentiation/personalization that support active engagement in meaningful learning experiences for all children, with specific examples.
- How the strategies and approaches can support children with diverse learning needs and strengths, including children who are learning English as a second language
Cite at least 5 scholarly resources to substantiate your thinking.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow