Discussing Freud and Erikson Psychoanalytic Theorists

October 3, 2022

Discussing Freud and Erikson Psychoanalytic Theorists

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Discussing Freud and Erikson Psychoanalytic Theorists

Create a 10- to 12-slide PowerPoint® presentation that discusses Freud, Erikson, and two other psychoanalytic or neo-psychoanalytic theorists. Note that the 10-12 slide minimum does not include your title slide, introduction and conclusion slides or reference slide(s).

Discuss the following in your presentation:

Why was Freud’s work so influential?

How did the analysts that followed Freud dissent from his viewpoint?

What links the theorists in the psychoanalytic theory group?

What are three or more psychoanalytic concepts relevant to today’s culture? Explain their relevance and provide a specific example of each concept.

Make sure that the presentation uses 3 sources: the text, a peer-reviewed journal article, and one other source of your choosing.

Make sure that the bulk of the information in your presentation is contained in the notes section. Your slide itself should follow the 6:6 rule (no more than 6 bullet points per slide, with 6 words per point).

Format your presentation according to APA guidelines, including using appropriate citations in both the notes section and on the slide itself if.

Discussing Freud and Erikson Psychoanalytic Theorists

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met