Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
409
Please find and investigate a case of real usage of cyber systems or continuous threats. Give a brief overview of the case, including the function of counterintelligence in detecting and mitigating the threat, as well as the role of analysis in identifying and addressing the issue. Please select a specific situation; nothing vague or abstract will allow you to write a summary.
410
Within the tenets of offensive counterintelligence, define detection, deception, and neutralization.
Within the field of law enforcement counterintelligence, discuss one example of each. How might putting these policies in place at the local, state, national, or international level help prevent crime?
Use sting operations from well-known law enforcement agencies as examples.
Make sure to include information from the week’s required readings in your discussion.
Please create a new word document for each title number. There will be reading materials included. Every piece of work should be referenced. It is suggested that you use two or more references.
Discussion about Counter-Intelligence Tools
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion about Counter-Intelligence Tools |
Discussion about Counter-Intelligence Tools