Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Assignment on Criminal Justice
Using an online search engine, you will need to conduct your own background study on your case as it relates to Module 4. To get information, you can use a range of tools and websites. Always double-check the site’s legitimacy. Please be aware that YAHOO NEWS is not permitted since the information, content, and writing are of poor professional and academic quality.
We talked about how prosecutors choose a case and the pre-trial activities that go along with it this week. Review your ‘High Profile Case’ and detail the pre-trial actions that occurred using material and ideas from this week’s readings, discussions, and activities.
Address the following questions in your reflective notebook for Module 4 posting: What activities took place prior to the trial?
Who were the stakeholders’ in the pre-trial and trial proceedings?
Were victim impact statements taken into account in the case?
If so, do you believe they had an impact on the judge’s decision?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Discussion Assignment on Criminal Justice