Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion of a BPH Case Study in Nursing
a similarity of less than 10%
Within 5 years after publication, use the APA 7th Edition Format and back your work with at least 3 peer-reviewed references. Remember to include a cover page and a reference page in your document. All paragraphs must be correctly referenced. Each paragraph must have at least four sentences and all responses must be written in a narrative fashion. Finally, disregarding the cover page and reference page, you must have at least 2 pages of material and no more than 3 pages.
Case Study is due by 11:59 p.m. EST on May 30, 2021. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Study of a Case
L.L. is a 67-year-old man who is suffering from BPH. He’s having a hard time urinating. He is currently taking Cozaar 100 mg for HTN, and his blood pressure is under control. He does not take any other drugs. His doctor has prescribed medication for his BPH, but he wants to try a herbal supplement first before taking the prescription.
1. In L.L’s condition, would you prescribe a herbal supplement?
2. What herbal supplement would he take if that’s the case?
3. What is the dosage that is recommended?
4. What are the herbal supplement’s possible adverse effects?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion of a BPH Case Study in Nursing |
Discussion of a BPH Case Study in Nursing