Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
, please respond completely to the following questions in at least 400 words (total). Keep in mind that you are always welcome to discuss the term “minimum requirement.”
1) Why might it be necessary to briefly review the history of the peoples of the Valley of Mexico, Central America, and South America before delving into the first peoples of the modern-day United States as described in the textbook chapter? In other words, how might the Olmec, Maya, Aztec, and Inca histories encourage us to reconsider the popular narrative/mainstream history of the United States?
2) Which key points/quotes from this week’s textbook chapter, “Follow the Corn,” struck you the most, and why? Kindly provide specific examples.
3) How might the textbook chapter relate to one of last week’s key terms? How and why did this happen?
4) How do you feel about Winona LaDuke’s TED Talk? What points might be significant in our comprehension of this week’s material?
5) How did you perceive Christopher Columbus previously, or what did you learn about him in elementary school? How did both articles alter your preconceived notions about Christopher Columbus?
6) Contrast and contrast the perspectives of the authors in the “Columbus Day Comic” and the “Flawed Critique of Columbus Day.”
7) What does the term “Doctrine of Discovery” mean, and how does it apply to an Indigenous perspective on US history?
8) What does the chapter title “Culture of Conquest” mean/refer to in the textbook? What passages from the chapter stood out to you, and why?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion of US Popular History |
Discussion of US Popular History