Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion on Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Weapons
The task at hand: For this course, your formal writing assignment is to choose ONE of the case studies below and then respond to a short series of questions about that case. Your case-study options are listed below, along with the questions you’ll need to answer and other writing guidelines:
Option 1: AI’s impact on the design and creative industries READ: What should a machine’s design limitations be? Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Aesthetics’ – https://www.archdaily.com/937051/when-machines-desire-aesthetics/
Option 2: Autonomous Weapons and Governance and Diplomacy Issues: Who Has Control? READ: https://cpr.unu.edu/ai-global-governance-when-autonomous-weapons-meet-diplomacy/AI & Global Governance: When Autonomous Weapons Meet Diplomacy
Option 3: Machine Learning, Algorithms, and Bias: Should/Can Unbiased Systems Be Designed? READ: ‘You can’t completely avoid bias in machine learning, but you can choose your bias.’ – https://venturebeat.com/2020/11/14/you-can…
(Answer both this will be the main focus of your writing): 1. In your case study, what are the main issues related to the use of artificial intelligence? What argument(s) are being made about the dangers of artificial intelligence? Please explain in your own words what you consider to be the most important parts of the text, making sure to include any key terms.
2. In light of the various types of artificial intelligence discussed in your case study, tell me how this technology can be made to work in a way that avoids the pitfalls or dangers mentioned in the case. Similarly, how do YOU define a “good” (as in ethical) use of this technology? (In composing your thoughts on this final question, you might want to refer to our readings on utilitarianism and deontology (duty ethics).) Other remarks and general writing guidelines:
– Essay length should be between 1,000 and 1,200 words (approximately 2.5+ pages).
– Format: follow proper essay structure throughout; make sure to introduce your topic/case study at the beginning.
briefly, as well as some closing thoughts; Also, remember to 1) keep your margins to a minimum.
2) keep the font within a normal range (11-12 point), and 3) keep the size of the font within a normal range (not too wide or too narrow).
3) Make use of a standard font style (Times New Roman, Gill Sans MT, etc.).
– No research was done aside from reading the case study.
– Source referencing: when citing anything from your reading on core ethical theories or
Choose a formal citation style (MLA, APA, etc.) from the Wallach and Allen text and use it.
Anything you’ve borrowed or gleaned from these sources (ideas or quotes, for example) should be consistent.
paraphrasing, must be properly acknowledged and cited. As previously stated, this is not a study.
paper. Please do not read anything other than the main readings (case study, core theories readings, and so on).
When responding to the above questions, use the Wallach and Allen text.
Discussion on Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Weapons
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Weapons |
Discussion on Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Weapons