Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion on Business Policy and the Concept of Whistleblowing
1. Why is it critical to avoid interpreting “whistleblowing” as “tattletale” or “ratting” on a coworker?
Your comment should be no more than 75 words long.
2. Why is it important for businesses to develop and implement environmental strategies?
Your comment should be no more than 75 words long.
3. How can companies ensure that their code of business ethics is read, understood, trusted, remembered, and followed instead of being ignored?
Your comment should be no more than 75 words long.
4. Would you create a code of business conduct if you owned a small firm? If so, what factors would you include in your model? How would you ensure that your employees followed ethical business practices if that wasn’t the case?
Your comment should be no more than 75 words long.
5. How do you see the relationship between personal and professional ethics? Are they the same, or should they be?
Discussion on Business Policy and the Concept of Whistleblowing
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on Business Policy and the Concept of Whistleblowing |
Discussion on Business Policy and the Concept of Whistleblowing