Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Please use the following link to determine your carbon footprint:
https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/ (This is a link to another website.)
Part 1: Please copy/paste your online carbon footprint calculation as part of your project after you’ve completed it.
Part 2: Explain your present carbon footprint in a brief essay (at least 200 words).
Examine the following topics:
(a) What are your primary sources of carbon emissions?
(b) What is your carbon footprint in comparison to the national average?
(c) Provide at least two strategies for reducing your (or your family’s) carbon footprint in the future.
You can make use of the materials listed below “https://greenninja.org/science-resources-viewer-solution/ (This is a link to an external site.)”, which is the “Green Ninja” website “..
Please feel free to tell your family and friends about your calculations!
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on Carbon Emissions Reduction |
Discussion on Carbon Emissions Reduction