Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
REVIEW BY OTHERS (2-3 sentences minimum; be descriptive and specific with your feedbackgeneral statements are not productive for peer reviewing)
A. What is the paper’s main argument (thesis statement)? Is it clear what this essay will be about from the first paragraph? What are your thoughts on their thesis? Is it compelling, and if not, why?
B. Which parts of the draft do you find the most clear? What are the most ambiguous terms?
C. Does the paper address all of the prompt’s requirements? Which part(s) can be expanded upon?
THE ESSENTIALS – make a list of what’s in the current draft and check or mark what’s missing.
Includes a brief synopsis or description of the two shows to help the reader get acquainted with them.
Using (1) critical frame, discusses television shows as (2) constructs and makes an argument.
To illustrate the main point, refers to specific moments in episodes (textual analysis).
6 sources are used (4 academic sources).
E. Make a remark about the writing style or organization: What do you think is working well and where do you think it could be improved?
Additional thoughts, concerns, or compliments?
1st of 1 slides
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Essay on Narrative Television Structures |
Essay on Narrative Television Structures