Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion on HMGT 372 violations and fines
HMGT 372 HMGT 372 HMGT 372 HMGT 372 HMGT 372 HM
The talk this week will assist you in locating infractions and fines inside a particular statute and legal system. Violations by HCOs and/or providers may be unlawful and subject to financial penalties. Not every agency is in charge of enforcing healthcare laws. The Office of Civil Rights is in charge of enforcing certain of them. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, State Professional Licensing Boards, and Federal Prosecutors are among the agencies involved. Some penalties are monetary in nature, while others might result in the loss of a professional license or facility registration. Providers and HCOs may be barred from participating in state or federal programs after committing a violation.
Format: Locate a recent newspaper or research article, as well as an industry newsletter, in which a health-care organization or provider was found guilty of malpractice, criminal negligence, fake credentials, failure to treat, or patient abandonment.
1. What is the article’s main point about a crucial health-care error?
2. Draw on your previous readings and experience. For both the HCO and the professional, determine what variables contributed to the error. Duties, scope of practice (state boards), and standard of care are all discussed.
3. Describe the case in detail, including which law was used and if it was tried in a criminal or civil court.
4. Separate the violation of the legal system from the consequence. What fines were imposed and what punishments might have been imposed but were not mentioned in the article?
Discuss the following with your coworkers: In their inquiries on the classmates’ descriptions, peers are expected to display critical thinking. The rules for conversations may be found under the Discussion Expectations and Grading section.
Reading materials assigned:
Part 2 of the discussion
Consider the following research questions:
1. Does the structure of the roles of renal transplant nurse coordinators have an impact on live donor rates?
2. Is there any link between the date and location of suicide prevention appointments and the suicide rates of veterans?
Reference Examples of Research Questions | PhD | School of Nursing | Vanderbilt University (n.d). (n.d.). https://nursing.vanderbilt.edu/phd/clinicalfaq.php was retrieved from https://nursing.vanderbilt.edu/phd/clinicalfaq.php
Pick one of the questions and explain it using what you learned in week two:
1. The procedure for coming up with a researchable question.
2. What kind of background evidence and problem definition did you use to create the researchable question?
3. Consider what will happen after the question has been posed.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on HMGT 372 violations and fines |
Discussion on HMGT 372 violations and fines