Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Paper on Human Anatomy
PART ONE
Many people get a flu vaccination every year to protect themselves from the virus.
Why should flu vaccines be given instead of “booster” injections? Why is the flu shot from last year ineffective against this year’s strain?
Discuss as a class which of the following types of immunization would be the best for preventing the flu, and explain your reasoning:
A. Injection into the muscle (intramuscular)
Nasal Spray (B)
C. Intradermal injection (ID)
BONUS PART
You will use your critical thinking and reasoning skills to answer the following questions in this Week Critical Thinking Exercise:
1. A surgeon removes some of a woman’s axillary lymph nodes when she has a cancer in her left breast. The patient has edema in her left arm as a result of the procedure. Please explain why.
2. A type A mother’s anti-B antibodies rarely harm the RBCs of a type B fetus. However, a Rh woman’s anti-D antibodies can cross the placenta and hemolyze the RBCs of a Rh+ fetus. Based on your knowledge of the five immunoglobulin classes, explain the difference.
3. What distinguishes a B cell from a plasma cell in terms of structure? Explain the relationship between their structural and functional differences.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion Paper on Human Anatomy |
Discussion Paper on Human Anatomy