Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Paper on Risk Management
There must be no plagiarism, a minimum of 450 words, and no grammar errors.
This week’s readings cover the broad context of risk as well as investigative forensics. Understanding when things go wrong is an important part of risk management; we must be able to investigate and report our findings to management. Discuss in detail how risk and investigation strategies could aid the organization using this study or other research you’ve discovered. ERM protects a business before an attack, whereas forensics investigation techniques assist us after an assault – therefore let’s talk about both this week.
Write a paragraph of 250 words, with each 100 words addressing the details listed below.
Pose an intriguing, well-thought-out question about the subject.
Provide a lot of background information about the subject.
In-depth explanation, definition, or analysis of the topic
Please share a relevant personal experience.
Provide an external source (for example, a UC Library article) that is relevant to the issue, as well as extra information on the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA 7)
Make a case for or against the topic.
In the opening discussion thread, at least one scholarly source should be used. Make sure to incorporate information from your readings as well as additional UC Library resources. In your post, provide relevant citations and references.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Discussion Paper on Risk Management