Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Paper on Website Evaluation
Assignment Expectations: The second assignment requirement for your Research Project is for students to perform a Website Evaluation of TWO websites that are appropriate for college-level academic research and contain information relevant to their research topic. Students will discover acceptable websites relating to their topics using a search engine of their choosing (e.g., Google or Bing) for this task. Students should submit a 250-word analysis on each website after selecting, evaluating, and analyzing them. Continue reading to learn more about where to source websites for this assignment and what you should include in your analysis. Please feel free to contact your instructor via email if you have any questions.
But first, let’s define a website evaluation:
There is a wealth of information available on the internet, and you can conduct much of your research from the comfort of your own home. However, not all information on the internet is appropriate for academic research. This project will assist you in evaluating websites that you locate on the internet for free.
Before you begin your Web Site Evaluation assignment, read the UMGC Library’s “Is My Source Credible” criteria for evaluating Web resources to see if the contents are of high quality and appropriate for college-level academic research: After that, watch their video “Evaluating Web Sites”:
Transcript
This tutorial on analyzing Web sites is brought to you by the Information and Library Services Department. In this video, you’ll discover how to tell if a website has reliable material that’s suitable for college-level research.
Many websites provide reliable material that can be used in college-level research. However, because no one supervises the information that is posted on the Internet, there are some websites that you should avoid using in a research paper: Websites providing out-of-date, erroneous, or prejudiced information, for example.
Here are some questions to ask to help you examine material you find on the internet critically:
Who is the website’s creator?
Is the information presented on the website biased or one-sided?
Is the information on the website correct?
Is the site up to date enough for your research?
This tutorial will delve deeper into such issues.
When you’re analyzing a website, think about who wrote the content. Is there a list of the author’s credentials? Consider the author’s knowledge and credibility. Knowing who wrote the information can assist you in determining the legitimacy of a website.
It’s possible that you’ll come upon an author whose qualifications aren’t shown on the website. If this happens, utilize Google or another search engine to see if you can uncover any additional information on the author on the Internet.
A company is frequently regarded as the creator of a website. A corporation, a professional group, or a government entity, for example, could be the creator of a Web site. On most organizations’ websites, there is a link that provides information about the organization’s activities, mission, leadership, and so on. Knowing more about the organization might help you assess the validity of the content on its website.
When assessing a website, consider whether it presents information that is as objective and neutral as feasible, or if it presents biased, one-sided material. It may be okay to employ biased information depending on your study project.
If you’re writing a pro/con essay regarding the chemical business and environmental groups, for example, you may quote facts from both a chemical industry association and environmental activists. However, you must be conscious of any potential bias in a Web site and useor not useit accordingly.
When assessing a website, you should also consider whether the information on the site is accurate. To check if the Web site has errors, compare the information on the site to what you’ve learned from other sources during your investigation. You could, for example, compare the content on a Web site to scholarly publications found in library databases, reference books, and so on. Also, does the website include sources for the information it provides, sources that you can research and verify?
Another key component is timeliness, especially if you’re investigating a subject like health and medicine, business, or technology, where knowledge can change quickly. Is the information on the website up to date? If so, is the information up to date for the issue you’re looking into?
On all types of Web sites, such as business Web sites, organizations, government, and education Web sites, you can obtain reliable, valuable information. However, regardless of the type of Web site you use, you must analyze the information it includes seriously.
More information about evaluating Web resources can be found on our library’s website. Also, please contact us via Ask a Librarian if you have any questions concerning your study.
https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/evaluating-sources.cfm
Please make sure that each study follows the structure below and includes the following information after you have selected, read, and analyzed your websites.
Before you begin, please make a list of what you should not do for this task. Please avoid visiting the following websites:
UMGC library databases (do not use any materials available in the library database, such as Jstor). These resources will be found in the library for future projects.)
Do not use Wikipedia or any other wiki site as a source of information (in fact, refrain from using these sites for any part of the research project)
Use no encyclopedia websites (for example, Britannica.org). These resources are great for general information, but they don’t meet the needs of this research assignment.)
Use only sites that do not demand a subscription (also, do not use any of these sites for the requirements of this research paper.)
Now, here’s what you should include in your Website Analysis:
Each Website Analysis should be typed in a word document with 1-inch margins, double-spaced, and no fewer than 250 words.
Students should give a thorough bibliographic record at the top of each Website Analysis. A formal citation, including the URL and the date of access, should be included in this comprehensive bibliographic item. It’s important to note that Chicago Humanities Style (rather than the author/date variant) is the prescribed style for this class. The Effective Writing Center published a Brief Guide to Citing Sources in Chicago that gives a quick introduction of how to use Chicago Humanities Style. It also offers a list of sources that have been structured in this manner. N stands for footnote/endnote format, while B stands for bibliographic entry. This tutorial can be found in the Writing Resources section of the Course Resources section of this LEO class site under Content.
Content and Analysis: In your own words, each Website Analysis should offer a clear overview of the article’s important elements. Finally, this should be provided inside the first two paragraphs of your analysis and should include the following information:
Describe the website’s content and purpose.
Determine the author, the accuracy of the material offered, and the current status of the website.
Explain how and why you came to the conclusion that the site is appropriate for use in an academic research report.
Each website evaluation should include an explanation of how the content relates to your research.
Explain how the site connects to your research topic or what you discovered on the site that is relevant to your research topic.
In this study, it is critical that students provide more than a single sentence. This section of the assignment should be given its own paragraph.
How to Submit Your Work: Students should submit their work according to the guidelines for the Website Evaluation Assignment. Attach the assignment here by clicking on it, scrolling to the bottom of the page until you see “Add Attachments,” and then clicking on it. This assignment can also be submitted through the Assignment tab. This assignment’s rubric will also be visible to students. Before submitting your final document, please make sure to review the rubric.
Brief Primer to Citing Sources in Chicago Humanities Style.pdf is an attachment to the Brief Primer to Citing Sources in Chicago Humanities Style.pdf document (566.22 KB) web-site-evaluation-checklist-form.pdf (152.51 KB)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion Paper on Website Evaluation |
Discussion Paper on Website Evaluation