Draft of Ethics Application Form
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Draft of Ethics Application Form
he “Undertaking Educational Enquiry – F2: Draft of Ethics Application Form” should be remade. Please use the materials attached to orders 9663726173 and 4481029508. The number of sources it is not strict but having 3 or 4 could be great. Please read the details below:
1. This triggers the ethics approval feedback and approval process with your supervisor. To give you an idea, once you have acted on the feedback for the ethics form and the information sheet (F3) and consent letter (F3) you will submit the ethics application.
2. The thesis is going to be about a combination of research on data collected about students who study in regular out-of-school English cram schools called Eikawa in Asao yard, a suburb of Tokyo and how these data could be used by the cram schools leaders to improve students academic success. The papers will also analyze how their English learning accumulated through studies in Eikawa can influence their school studies, and how parents and school teachers see these studies influence on their future academic studies.
In Japan, there are a large number of Eikawa cram schools (I will provide the numbers and how many employers they have on average) in the chosen area.
In the first part, it will be explored
o Documentary analysis of web presence and materials produced
o What other out-of-school activities are attended by the students who attend the Eikawa classes in a suburb of Tokyo.
o Who attends them (compared for gender, achievement, neighborhood)
o How different groups (parents, teachers, students) value this activity
o Links made between these activities and learning
o Comparing two groups: Eikawa attendees and a group of non-attenders
– Students sharing stories about why they attend and why they might recommend them. A number of 4-5 students who attend Eikawa will make a dairy recording for two weeks and share their stories about why they attend and why they might recommend them.
– A group of 4-5 students (it is intended to have a similar number of…) who never attend such groups might talk about why they do not.
In the second part, to make a connection to educational leadership, it will be explored
O If educational leaders might be interested in having access to these data and why.
O How these data could be used by educational leadership to improve the Eikawa teaching and learning
O In what other (practical) ways could be used these data in an Eikawa institution.By now, these are the points. If there will be any changes, I will inform you soon.
LOTS of THANK YOU for your hard work!Draft of Ethics Application Form
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Draft of Ethics Application Form