Early Days of The World Wide Web
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Early Days of The World Wide Web
Mini Research Paper: Internet Bubble History Research Paper
Objective | Guidelines | Milestones | Grading Rubrics | Best Practices
Objective
You are to research the rise and fall of the early days of the World Wide Web. In 1993, Tim Berners-Lee created the Web and the bubble began. The bubble describes the amazing stock run of Internet companies, when their values soared to unbelievable and what were thought to be unattainable heights from 1993 to 2001.
Suddenly, the overpriced giants crashed. Individual investors lost millions and the NASDAQ (the stock exchange for most Internet companies) came tumbling down. What happened? Why did it happen? What could have been done to stop this unsafe surge in valuation?
Your objective is to research this bubble and outline the basics of this extraordinary time. Which companies made the most? Which companies lost the most?
The guidelines for your paper are below.
Guidelines
The final paper must be five to six pages in length (this would be roughly one page per area included in the report), following APA format standards (title page and reference page are not part of the page-count criteria).
APA style of citation and five scholarly sources are required. Be sure to look up how to cite an interview for APA style.
All DeVry University policies are in effect, including the plagiarism policy.
Any questions about these papers may be discussed in the weekly Q & A Discussion topic.
This project is worth 125 total points.
These papers will be graded on quality of research topic, quality of paper information, use of citations, grammar, and sentence structure.
Milestones
Week 1
Your paper is assigned, and your research begins.
Weeks 2 and 3
Continue finding scholarly sources and start writing your paper. Do NOT wait until the end to start your research.
Week 4
Submit your paper. For APA format guidance, please refer to the APA Tutorial in the Syllabus. Ensure that the body of your paper, excluding cover page and sources, exceeds the minimum, and that all of the assignment requirements have been met. Please use a cover page for this assignment. Submit it to the Week 4 Assignments Dropbox.
Grading Rubrics
Category Points % Description Insight 50 40 What insights did you gain from your research? What did you learn from this business history? Analysis 25 20 Did you interpret the message from the research and integrate it with the lessons you have learned in our course? Did you effectively analyze information and demonstrate a mastery of the subject matter? Organization 25 20 Was the paper organized and did it tell the story of the Internet bubble in a clear and concise way? Grammar/Spelling 15 12 Ensure that your paper is well written. Overall 10 8 Overall paper should be cohesive and tell a story. The story should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. In other words, make the paper an enjoyable and compelling read. Total 125 100 A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. Best Practices
The following are best practices in preparing this paper.
Cover Page: Include your name, title of the paper, and your Professor.
Table of Contents: List the main ideas and sections of the paper and the pages where they are located. Illustrations should be included separately.
Introduction: Use a header on your paper. This will indicate that you are introducing the paper.
The purpose of an introduction or opening is to
introduce the subject and why the subject is important;
preview the main ideas and the order in which they will be covered; and
establish the tone of the document.
Include in the introduction a reason for the audience to read the paper. Also, include an overview of what you will cover and the importance of the material. (This should include or introduce the questions you are asked to answer in each assignment.)
Body of the Report: Use a header with the name of the project. An example is, “The Development of Hotel X: A World Class Resort.” Proceed to break out the main ideas: State the main ideas, the major points of each idea, and provide evidence. Show some type of division, such as separate, labeled sections; separate groups of paragraphs; or headers. Include the information you found during your research and investigation.
Summary and Conclusion: Summarizing is similar to paraphrasing but presents the gist of the material in fewer words than the original. An effective summary identifies the main ideas and the major support points from the body of the report; minor details are left out. Summarize the benefits of the ideas and how they affect the subject.
Resources Page: Use the citation format specified in the Syllabus.
Early Days of The World Wide Web
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow