Economic Value Added Discussion Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Economic Value Added Discussion Assignment
Description
Estimate and analyze the economic value added (EVA) for the past two years for Rogers Wireless.
– DATA PROVIDED
-SAMPLE PROVIDED OF WHAT’S REQUIRED FROM DATA
– ONLY CABLE, INTERNET AND MEDIAYou are required to follow the steps outlined below and produce a report in the form of an executive summary which should be no more than one page long. In a word-processed document your analysis of the results should include:
Discussion of how well the company is creating (or destroying) value, as well as how this compares with any increases (or decreases) in the market value of the company.
Analysis of how well this aligns with the strategy of the company, including any changes in strategy.
Identification of any challenges faced by the company or industry which could affect the results. The management discussion in the annual report can help as a starting point.
You should also include a spreadsheet that includes all the data and formulas, but only as a reference tool. Make sure to properly reference all of your sources, and clearly justify any assumptions.
Economic Value Added Discussion Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Economic Value Added Discussion Assignment
Economic Value Added Discussion Assignment