Enumerate the Reasons for The Failure of Waterfall Model
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Enumerate the Reasons for The Failure of Waterfall Model
ASSIGNMENT 1 At less 3000 words
- (a) What are functional and non-functional requirements? (10mks)
(b) Explain the steps involved in the prototyping (10mks)
(c) Enumerate the reasons for the failure of Waterfall Model. (5mks)
- (a) Define Software Reliability (5mks)
(b) What is Modularity? (10mks)
(c) Explain why professional software is not just the programs that are developed for a
customer. (10mks)
- (a) What is the most important difference between generic software product development and
custom software development? What might this mean in practice for users of generic
software products? (10mks)
(b) What are the four important attributes that all professional software should have? Suggest
four other attributes that may sometimes be significant. (8mks)
(c) Apart from the challenges of heterogeneity, business and social change, and trust and
security, identify other problems and challenges that software engineering is likely to face in
the 21st century (Hint: think about the environment). (7mks)
- (a) Based on your own knowledge of some of the application types, explain, with examples,
why different application types require specialized software engineering techniques to
support their design and development. (15mks)
(b) Explain why there are fundamental ideas of software engineering that apply to all types of
software systems. (10mks)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow