Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Environmental Adaptation Discussion Responses Discussion
Part II. Please respond to one of the three prompts in Part II.
Communication Ethics in Action Tuberculosis Medication Stock out Questions
These questions are based on this reading, pg. 266-268: Stock Outs.pdf
Create a post and answer the questions below. Incorporate at least one principle from the Public Health Leadership Society’s code of conduct and any other relevant values. Also, include any facts, citing them.
What decision must be made? (This may be harder to define than you originally think.)
What are the one or more moral problems?
Who is the ultimate decision maker that will decide whether to enact a solution and provide the resources necessary for enactment?
Who, if anyone, can be an ally who can help persuade the ultimate decisionmaker to address the one or more moral problems?
Thus far, who has the researcher involved in the process for critically examining the one or more moral problems (identify the types of people rather than naming specific individuals)? Do not identify the one or more allies here. For each type of person:
What is his/her organization (identify the type of organization rather than naming specific organizations)?
What has been his/her role in the process for critically examining the moral problem? Describe the role in terms of being a content expert or working team member.
What additional steps do you think the researcher should take before deciding whether to whistle blow to the public?
2 attachments
Slide 1 of 2
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Environmental Adaptation Discussion Responses Discussion |
Environmental Adaptation Discussion Responses Discussion