Errors in Reasoning Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Errors in Reasoning Assignment
Assignment 2: Errors in Reasoning
In this assignment, you will select one of the claims listed below. Using what you know about the topic, describe at least four claims that might commonly be made that display some of the errors in reasoning covered in this module’s readings. You may have to do a bit of research to find popular positions on these topics.
For example, if the claim is: Children should not be allowed to play violent video games.
Then four common claims about the subject might be:
- Children have always played violent games and they turned out okay.
- Dr. Dre says that violent video games are okay.
- Everybody knows that violent video games don’t cause problems.
- Many countries banned violent video games and they have higher crime rates than we do.
And the errors they represent might be:
- Children have always played violent games and they turned out okay (appeal to tradition and false analogy).
- Dr. Dre says that violent video games are okay (argument by mistaken authority).
- Everybody knows that violent video games don’t cause problems (appeal to common belief).
- Many countries banned violent video games and they have higher crime rates than we do (post hoc ergo propter hoc).
Because
- Any sentence that talks about how we have always done something as a way to justify doing it is an appeal to tradition.
- The claim looks like it comes from an authority, but Dr. Dre is a musician, not a doctor.
- Any claim that says that everyone knows something as a way to justify doing it is an appeal to common belief.
- Showing that two things happened (that video games are accepted and crime is up) does not prove that the two things are related or that the first caused the second; this is called post hoc ergo propter hoc, which means after this, so because of this.
Select one of these topics. Using what you know about the topic and additional research you conduct, describe at least four claims that might commonly be made that display some of the errors in reasoning covered in this module’s readings.
- Should people under 18 be subjected to legal curfews or restricted driving privileges?
- Should libraries be required to install filtering software or otherwise censor the materials that they provide?
- Should insurance companies be required to pay for breast reconstruction, birth control pills, or Viagra?
- Should the use of camera phones be banned in gymnasiums or other locations?
Write your 600-word response in the Microsoft Word document format. Name the file M2_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc, and submit it to the M2: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Wednesday, August 23, 2017.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Errors in Reasoning Assignment