Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Complete a five-page essay on the following subject:
Kant vs. Mill is the overarching theme.
Examine Kant’s ideas about duty and good will. According to Kant, what role should emotion play in moral decision-making? Define the Categorical Imperative in his case. Compare and contrast this with J.S. Mill’s overall ethical position. What do you think Mill’s main distinction from Kant is? Finally, consider the following policy implications during the COVID-19 crisis: What would be the differences in their recommendations? Do you have a preference for one method over the other?
Three things are required:
Please give your essay a thorough introduction that explains its overall scope and direction.
At least four citations from our Ethics text (at least one on Mill) should be used to support your summary of the material, using a standard referencing system (APA or MLA). (DOCUMENT ATTACHED)
Essays that do not adhere to these guidelines will be returned for revision.
Essays should be written in 12-point New Times Roman, double-spaced, with standard margins.
1st of 1 slides
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Essay on Kant vs Mill and Covid in Philosophy |
Essay on Kant vs Mill and Covid in Philosophy