Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Essay on Well-Known Philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill
Hello, I’m working on an assignment. Everything is explained in detail further down. (An attachment contains the guidelines for the written assignment.)
1. Summarize Immanuel Kant’s approach to moral issues in at least one paragraph.
2. Please summarize John Stuart Mill’s approach to moral issues in a second full paragraph.
3. In a third paragraph, state and explain the most significant difference between these two points of view. (You could also talk about any *similarities* you found between these two points of view.)
4. Finally, please describe an ethical decision you’ve had to make in at least one paragraph. This could be a simple, every-day decision, or one that you’ve struggled with for a long time. (For example, you could discuss whether or not to keep a specific promise.) You could also discuss whether or not to volunteer at a charity event. Please let me know if you have any questions about this!)
5. Finally, describe how you believe Kant and Mill would approach the issue you chose. Who do you believe has a better solution to your problem? Please elaborate.
Essays should be at least 500 words long and adhere to the “Guidelines for Written Assignments” standards.
Essay on Well-Known Philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Essay on Well-Known Philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill |
Essay on Well-Known Philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill