Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Ethics by Phil Virtue Deontology Utilitarianism
What are some of the essential tenets, benefits, and drawbacks of each of the following, according to course materials (be specific)? Keep in mind that these should be prepared as essays:
1) Ethics of Virtue
Deontology is the study of morality.
Utilitarianism is a third option.
Keep in mind that this post should be written in the style of an essay. How do you feel about each of these? Which one is the most similar to your personal decision-making process? Which do you recommend to others in the future, and why do you recommend it? Make a point of bringing up certain portions that appeal to you or that demand explanation.
Talk to your friends about it.
Part one should include a reference to your own article, which you should use to illustrate why you agree or disagree with something in their post. Provide a different or additional explanation for passages they may have quoted. Be generous and respectful.
2 to 3 paragraphs are required.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Ethics Deontology Phil Virtue Utilitarianism |
Ethics Deontology Phil Virtue Utilitarianism