evaluation criteria ment in a commentary format
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 |
Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago |
Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Evaluation Report
Kindly enter evaluation criteria ment in a commentary format for each section below. If not included in the article, please indicate. Also specify if information exempt was needed.
Introduction:
Background/Literature Support:
Methodology:
Results:
Discussion:
Bibliography/References:
Problem statement identified, population specified, other key factors noted:
Decision:
Please rate the following: (1 = Excellent) (2 = Good) (3 = Fair) (4 = poor)
Originality:
Contribution To The Field:
Technical Quality:
Clarity Of Presentation :
Depth Of Research/Content:
Recommendation
Please mark with an X below
Accept As Is:
Requires Minor Corrections:
Requires Moderate Revision:
Requires Major Revision:
Submit To Another Publication Such As:
Reject on grounds of (Please be specific)
RUBRIC
|
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
|
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
|
Average Score
50-85%
|
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
|
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
|
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
|
Poor Quality
0-45%
|
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
|
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
|
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
|
|
|
|
|
|
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
evaluation criteria ment in a commentary format
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
evaluation criteria ment in a commentary format
Instructions:
Evaluation Report
Kindly enter evaluation criteria ment in a commentary format for each section below. If not included in the article, please indicate. Also specify if information exempt was needed.
Introduction:
Background/Literature Support:
Methodology:
Results:
Discussion:
Bibliography/References:
Problem statement identified, population specified, other key factors noted:
Decision:
Please rate the following: (1 = Excellent) (2 = Good) (3 = Fair) (4 = poor)
Originality:
Contribution To The Field:
Technical Quality:
Clarity Of Presentation :
Depth Of Research/Content:
Recommendation
Please mark with an X below
Accept As Is:
Requires Minor Corrections:
Requires Moderate Revision:
Requires Major Revision:
Submit To Another Publication Such As:
Reject on grounds of (Please be specific)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
evaluation criteria ment in a commentary format
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
admin
Related posts
Unlock Your Government Career Potential:
Read more
Government Career Transformation: Apply Confidently with Our Help
Read more
Dreaming of Government Employment? We Provide Expert Application Assistance
Read more