Evaluation of Gang Intervention Essay Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Evaluation of Gang Intervention Essay Assignment
Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
Option #1: Evaluation of Gang Intervention
Gang activity is pervasive in some communities. The amount of crime attributed to gang members is growing, and events such as drive-by shootings are not uncommon. Communities have demanded the police and courts get tough on gangs. Parents and the schools argue that getting tough will be effective in disbanding the gangs.
First, read this article: Review of European Youth Gang Policy in Comparative Context (Links to an external site.)
After reading this article, along with the readings assigned for this week, evaluate the effectiveness of gang intervention by addressing the following questions:
- What are the most common police and system responses to gang activity both in the U.S. and the E.U.?
- What is considered to be the most effective intervention by law enforcement officials for responding to gangs? Why is it the most effective intervention?
- What is the most common educational intervention for ganging? What impact has it had on youth involved in gangs?
- Are the programs instituted in the E.U. substantively different from the programs in the U.S.? Do they appear to be more effective?
Your paper must meet the following requirements:
- Your written paper should be 2-3 pagesin length not counting the title and reference pages, which you must include.
- Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.
- Cite at least three scholarly sources for this assignment. Scholarly resources include: peer-reviewed journal articles, books, the class textbook, or reports/documents from the government (.gov sites). A scholarly source does not include general sources from the internet (.com, .org, .edu, and .net sites are not scholarly). Scholarly resources should be current (no older than five years). If the class textbook is used as a source, then two other scholarly sources must be used.
Prior to posting, proof read your submission for clarity, grammar, punctuation, and APA.
Option #2: Typologies of Youth Gangs
First, read this article: Review of European Youth Gang Policy in Comparative Context (Links to an external site.)
After reading this article, along with the readings assigned for this week, compare and contrast the different typologies of youth gangs in the United States and how these may differ from gangs in the EU.
In your analysis, examine the following in relation to each gang type:
- History
- Membership
- Use of drugs
- Violence
- Community protection
- Impact on the communities in which they reside.
Your paper must meet the following requirements:
- Your written paper should be 2-3 pagesin length not counting the title and reference pages, which you must include.
- Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.
- Cite at least three scholarly sources for this assignment. Scholarly resources include: peer-reviewed journal articles, books, the class textbook, or reports/documents from the government (.gov sites). A scholarly source does not include general sources from the internet (.com, .org, .edu, and .net sites are not scholarly). Scholarly resources should be current (no older than five years). If the class textbook is used as a source, then two other scholarly sources must be used.
Prior to posting, proof read your submission for clarity, grammar, punctuation, and APA.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow