Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
evidence that can be retrieved from a mobile device
W7:
You will need to cite at least two current, quality academic and/or professional resources in your post. Your textbook may be one of your resources. Wikipedia and personal blogs do not qualify as quality resources.
- Please respond to the following in a post of at least200 words:
. Summarize the article you located.
. Explain why you selected this particular article as opposed to others.
. Specify how investigators used forensic analysis to analyze the crime.
. Provide the link to the article.
. Provide full citations and references, formatted according to Strayer Writing Standards, in your post.
- For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
- In 60–75 words, please respond to at leastone other post. Choose to respond to those who have few or no responses.
- Consider what intrigued you about your classmate’s article. What did you find particularly effective about how the investigators used forensic analysis to analyze the crime? What improvements do you think the investigators could have made to their forensic analysis?
W8:
You will need to cite at least two quality, academic and/or professional resources, written within the past five years, in your post. Your textbook may be one of your resources. Wikipedia and personal blogs do not qualify as quality resources.
- Please respond to the following in a post of at least200 words:
. Summarize the specifics about the mobile forensic tool you selected, including its description, minimum functions, advantages and disadvantages, and costs.
. Share with your classmates a link to the mobile forensic tool you researched.
. Determine what you believe is the most important piece of evidence that can be retrieved from a mobile device based on these devices’ storage capabilities.
- Be sure to include your rationale.
. Identify at least two specific challenges investigators face when acquiring evidence from a mobile device.
. Provide full citations and references, formatted according to Strayer Writing Standards, in your post.
- For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
- In 60–75 words, please respond to at leastone other post. Choose to respond to those who have few or no responses.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results