Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
System requirements, Strengths and weaknesses
W6:
You will need to cite at least two quality, academic and/or professional resources, written within the past five years, in your post. Your textbook may be one of your resources. Wikipedia and personal blogs do not qualify as quality resources.
- Please respond to the following in a post of at least200 words:
. For each of your three selected tools, describe the:
- System requirements.
- Costs.
- Competing products.
- Strengths and weaknesses.
- Main uses.
. Share with your classmates the links to each of your selected tools.
. Assess the importance of graphic files to digital investigations.
. Provide a scenario in which a graphic file would be invaluable evidence.
. Provide full citations and references, formatted according to Strayer Writing Standards, in your post.
- For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
- In 60–75 words, please respond to at least one other post. Choose to respond to those who have few or no responses.
. Consider a classmate’s post that researched a different tool than you did. What appeals to you about this particular tool? What are some of your concerns about your classmate’s selected tool?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results