Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Exploring Clients Experiences Social Science Discussion
I’m working on a social science discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Many social workers informed by feminist theory today emphasize the need for intersectionality, which generally highlights the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race and class, as well as gender, and can create overlapping systems of disadvantage.
Review online or other sources of information about organizations or movements approaching their work from a feminist perspective—perhaps those working on reproductive rights or intimate partner violence—to examine ways that they incorporate other dimensions of identity, as well. How would an intersectional lens bring a feminist social worker to different insights than one more narrowly focused on gender?
Exploring Clients’ Experiences Discussion
Our clients come to us as individuals with unique experiences shaped by the social, cultural, family, and political environments they inhabit.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Discuss the approach(es) you will take to exploring your client’s experiences with these environments and how you will approach cultural differences between you and your clients. Consider the benefits and drawbacks to broaching these subjects during the intake.
Exploring Clients Experiences Social Science Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Exploring Clients Experiences Social Science Discussion |
Exploring Clients Experiences Social Science Discussion