Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Federal Hate Crime Laws Criminal Justice Essay
Explain hate crimes and review the various categories that are protected under federal hate crime laws. Why might some groups be protected while others are not? What other categories of individuals or groups who are not protected under the law might be targets for hate crimes? Your research paper should include a definition of hate crime as a crime motivated at least in part by bias. You should review the main categories that are protected under federal hate crime laws, which include race, religion, ethnicity/national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and disability. You should discuss why the laws protect these groups but not others. You should also suggest unprotected categories that could be targets for hate or bias crimes; possible answers could include bias against the homeless, age-related bias, and bias related to political affiliation. Requirements:
Governance and Participatory Budgeting Paper
I’m working on a writing multi-part question and need a sample draft to help me learn.
Instructions:
Please write a reflection on what you have learned
about governance and Participatory Budgeting. Be sure to answer at least three of the following
questions in your response:
? What is participatory budgeting and how does it contribute to participatory governance?
? How is participatory budgeting an example of direct democracy?
? How does participatory budgeting differ from the existing budgeting process?
? What are some of the benefits of participatory budgeting? What are some of the challenges?
? Few Americans understand where and how their taxes are distributed. Spend some time
exploring the Urban Institute’s article and infographic, What everyone should know about their
state’s budget, and please explain what Illinois spends the most money on per capita. Why do
you think spending might be allocated in this way? Does this affect your daily life? How so?
(*Hint: don’t just look at the rankings, but look at the amount spent per person.)
? According to What everyone should know about their state’s budget, how does Illinois’s spending
compare with other states? Do you think Illinois should dedicate more funds elsewhere?
Resources:
? What everyone should know about their state’s budget –
https://apps.urban.org/features/what-drives-state-…
? PB Homepage – https://www.participatorybudgeting.org/ (there is a 4 minute video that helps
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Federal Hate Crime Laws Criminal Justice Essay |
Federal Hate Crime Laws Criminal Justice Essay