Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Savage Inequalities Case Study Discussion Essay
This week’s first reading, “Savage inequalities,” is written by Jonathan Kozol. It is taken from Savage Inequalities, New York: Harper Collins. 1991. p. 175 – 184. (D 1991 by Jonathan Kozol, Reprinted by permission of Crown Publishers, Inc, WARNING: These copyrighted materials should not be copied and redistributed to others; copying and redistributing these materials is a breach of copyright law. This week’s second reading, ” The Inequalities are Still Savage, “is written by Daniel Katz, PhD. You are encouraged to search around on his blog.
Use these links to answer the following questions:
https://cdn.inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net/91a3e27f-d822-42f8-9722-a77faa6f5e83/14_SAVAGE%20INEQUALITIES.doc?token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCIsImtpZCI6ImNkbiJ9.eyJyZXNvdXJjZSI6Ii85MWEzZTI3Zi1kODIyLTQyZjgtOTcyMi1hNzdmYWE2ZjVlODMvMTRfU0FWQUdFJTIwSU5FUVVBTElUSUVTLmRvYyIsInRlbmFudCI6ImNhbnZhcyIsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsImlhdCI6MTU4ODAwNDE5MiwiZXhwIjoxNTg4MDkwNTkyfQ.tPy5q1QZDvT27rds4w7szkGa-M7wj4zEyJtv3JFNyCHJp7hKBPaA9WJQ2woBxQoOeNFVWeq4jOIgz5J9mbBImg&download=1&content_type=application%2Fmsword
https://danielskatz.net/2016/01/15/the-inequalities-are-still-savage/
1.Select three quotations from each reading (a total of six) that stood out to you, then, explain what they mean to you and why you thought these particular quotations were noteworthy.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Savage Inequalities Case Study Discussion Essay |
Savage Inequalities Case Study Discussion Essay