Financial Analysis on Contingent liability
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Financial Analysis on Contingent liability
Company Name: SAMSUNG
Structure OF Report:
- a) Financial Analysis on
- Contingent liability,
- method of depreciation used,
- sales returns comparision {as they have recalled all the S7 mobile phones and washing machines due to blast}
- b) Effect on the Earning per share (EPS) due to all the issues like, S7 blast, washing machine blast & bribery case.
—————————————————————————————————————————–
This assignment is all about finding CRITIC in the company’s annual report. You are supposed to find mistakes in the annual report. Comparing all three annual report, finding mistakes either in 2017 or 2016 or 2015. Comment at each section if Samsung is been true and fair their report. If nothing is found in a particular section of the structure, is it okay. But this report should at least include 60% of critic, if not more. Please remember to include snapshots of all proof you find in your report.
You are suppose compare each structure especially the first one (the conceptual framework) to the AASB Standards (http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/ACCED264_06-15.pdf)
to see if its matches. And comment on your findings.
Also you are to compare the annual reports with what the outside opinion says or thinks. Examples are below:
Example 1: in 2016 , Samsung had a recall of all note 7 due to explosion, and the share prices fell, and all outside opinion, news agencies reported they will make a loss in revenue or profit, compare this opinion with the annual report of that year, and see if the accountant recorded the loss or profit for that year.
Example 2: depreciation method, check what depreciation method is been use by the company, and compare it to the AASB standards if it the same.
Example 3: check the news for any going or past legal matter and see if its been reported in the annual report of the year under contingent liabilities
Example 4: suitability report, compare it to what outside people are saying, news, see if Samsung a causing harm to the society by dumping waste on the environment, rather than what they have reported in their annual report.
Other examples that you can look into are: Fair Value, Faithful representation of Property, plant Equipment, corporate governance, lease, intangible assets, and recognition of liabilities, social responsibility, reputation.
If you can find any errors outside this you can include it in your report, Just follow the AASB Standards. Include the section of the AASB Standards that is in contradiction with any part of the annual report in your report by quoting or referencing that particular area so as to avoid plagiarism.
Writing style:
-Word limit: 2000-2500 words (±10%) (excluding reference list)
-The response should be professionally presented in Arial 10pt or Times New Roman 12pt, single space.
-Harvard (Anglia) style referencing.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Financial Analysis on Contingent liability