First Philosophy, translated and edited by Cottingham
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
First Philosophy, translated and edited by Cottingham
Please read Meditation 2 from Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, translated and edited by Cottingham (CUP, 1996)
Here are questions for the First Informal Writing assignment
From the top of page 20 (Paragraph 30), Descartes begins another argument, which is often referred to as the “Wax argument.” (1) WHY does he go on to talk about a piece of wax? (2) WHAT is the wax argument supposed to show? For each part of your answer, cite ONE direct quote from the text to support your answers and explanations. (Do not use direct quotes from the text to replace your own answers and explanations; they should be used as textual evidence for what YOU say.)
Your answers should not exceed ONE page, double-spaced.
NEED IT IN 5 HOURS
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow First Philosophy, translated and edited by Cottingham