Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Assignment Guidelines
Submit a 1012 page scholarly, APA-formatted paper in which you:
Develop SAMR objectives for the implementation of the framework.
Evaluate the alignment of your objectives with the overall goal.
Evaluate the alignment of your objectives with the unique characteristics of the specific educational setting.
Evaluate the alignment of your objectives with the professional literature.
Determine a curricular focus. Will your framework address gaps in proficiency through the following:
The addition of ICT classes to the curriculum?
The integration of technology within existing classes?
Extra-curricular classes?
Some other approach?
Discuss the role of stakeholders in the school community.
Explain the actions that need to be taken to implement the framework, including an explanation of why these actions need to happen.
What challenges do you anticipate when implementing this framework? What proactive strategies could stakeholders use for addressing the potential challenges you identified?
Propose a plan for promoting and sustaining consensus among all relevant stakeholders, such as students, administrators, teachers, and parents.
List resources needed to carry out the implementation of the framework. Consider the resources that may be needed within the target school or district as well as resources that may be needed from the community.
Develop a comprehensive framework to enhance digital literacy in all students. Your framework should:
Be specific, logically presented, and ready for implementation.
Impact all students in the specific educational setting.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |