Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Case Study
2 PAGES
Your answers should clearly reflect your critical thinking skills, and your understanding of the subject matter.
Make necessary assumptions, wherever required
Your answers should be original in writing
Submit your answers in a word document with 1.5 line spacing, 12 font size.
Attach the excel file if you have used any spreadsheet
Plagiarism of any kind will make the submission invalid
All the Very best
—— —
Use the case of Selling Short: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters to answer the following questions.
1)Critically review the short sales activity from a market efficiency perspective.
2)As an Independent Financial Consultant, present a note on the Green Mountain’s
present and future business prospects.
3) The Bull and Bear cases presented for Green Mountain. Conduct a critical assessment of
these two views. Support your answer with necessary quantitative analysis.
4)Present a note on the financial misconduct at Green Mountain, if any and its impact on the valuations. What control
measures you would suggest to prevent the financial misconduct?
5) What will be your recommendation to Dirks to take a short position in Green Mountain stock?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow