Hamlet by Shakespeare Case Study Short Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Hamlet by Shakespeare Case Study Short Essay
Questions to Consider:
1. What is the political structure (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. of medieval Denmark?
2. Why is Hamlet not made King (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. upon the death of his father?
3. Do you know what Denmark looks like so you can picture the setting? Look (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and also here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
4. Is Denmark a wealthy country or a poor one?
5. When (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. is the play set?
6. What do you know about that time period?
7. Does Gertrude love her first husband?
8. Does she love her new husband?
9. Does she love her son, Hamlet?
10. Is Gertrude aware of her first husband’s murder?
11. Does Hamlet really see the ghost of his dead father?
12. Is Hamlet crazy or sane?
13. Does Hamlet love Ophelia?
14. What is Hamlet’s plan to “out” his father’s murderer?
15. Does Hamlet’s plan work?
16. Who dies in the play and how?
17. What is Horatio’s role?
18. Who survives at the end?
19. Who becomes the ruler of Denmark at the end of the play?
20. Consider Ophelia. Is she a strong character or a weak character? Now read this (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..In 3-5 pages, please answer the following questions. You may do them separately, one question per page, or you may combine them into a singular essay. Either is fine.
1. Why does Hedda marry George Tesman? Why does George marry Hedda? Do you think George believes Hedda loves him? Use critical thinking and evidence from the text.2. Describe Hedda’s relationship to Thea. If you had to guess, where do you picture Thea Elvsted a few years after the end of this play?
Hedda makes a very strong decision at the end of the play. Without making any moral judgements of your own, consider HER character. Why does Hedda make this decision and is there symbolism in her method?
Discuss the flowing questions about acting:
Which actors did you feel were correctly cast in their parts? Which actors were not cast wisely? Why?
How well were the physical characteristics, facial features, and voice qualities of the actors suited to the characters they were attempting to portray?
If a performance was unconvincing, was it unconvincing because the actor was miscast, or did he or she simply deliver an incompetent performance?
Make sure to post a clip or two with examples of the actors and the roles they portray.
Answers should be between 250-500 words in paragraph format and include works cited in MLA format
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Hamlet by Shakespeare Case Study Short Essay
Hamlet by Shakespeare Case Study Short Essay